天然马尾松群体遗传结构的研究

天然马尾松群体遗传结构的研究

GENETIC DIVERSITY OF PROTEIN IN ALCOHOL FOR PINUS MASSONIANA FROM NATURAL POPULATION

吴若菁　

　　醇溶蛋白是种子的贮藏蛋白,在对麦类植物的醇溶蛋白研究中,发现醇溶蛋白的电泳谱带的带纹多少及组合方式完全受基因型所控制,几乎不受环境的影响,可以构成品种的指纹(Drapar,1987;Zillman et al., 1979).因而几年来,国内外已将醇溶蛋白电泳分析应用到遗传育种、种子鉴定、资源保存利用以及物种起源、演化分类研究等方面(颜启传等,1992;傅宾孝等,1993;吴若菁等,1997;2000;杨瑞武等,2000;王志容等,2000;李名旺等,2000).……

参考文献：

［1］傅宾孝,于光华,王乐凯等.小麦醇溶蛋白电泳分析的新方法.作物学报,1993,19(2):185～187
［2］葛颂,黄敏仁,许农.马尾松GOT、LDH和MDH同工酶的遗传方式和连锁关系.遗传学报,1987,14(6):428～435
［3］解荷峰.马尾松天然群体的遗体学结构.南京林业大学学报,1990,14(4):36～43
［4］李名旺,於丙军,顾德兴等.半夏属的花粉粒和醇溶蛋白比较.武汉植物学研究,2000,18(3):250～252
［5］王志容,魏育明,兰香锦等.四川三个专用小麦的贮藏蛋白分析.四川农业大学学报,2000,18(1):18～20
［6］王中仁.植物等位酶分析.北京:科学出版社,1996,145～154
［7］吴若菁,苏红蓉,危彝斌等.马尾松与黑松种子醇溶蛋白鉴别的研究.福建林学院学报,1997,17(4):293～296
［8］吴若菁,赖文胜,程朝阳等.火炬松等5种松树的醇溶蛋白图谱研究.福建林学院学报,2000,20(1):46～48
［9］杨瑞武,周永红,郑有良.几种特异小麦的醇溶蛋白电泳分析.四川农业大学学报,2000,18(1):15～17
［10］杨瑞武,周永红,郑有良.披碱草属的醇溶蛋白研究.四川农业大学学报,2000,18(1):11～14
［11］颜启传,黄亚军,徐媛.试用ISTA推荐的种子醇溶蛋白电泳方法鉴定大麦和小麦品种.作物学报,1992,18(1):61～67
［12］Drapar S R. ISTA variety committee report of the working group for biochemical tests for cultivar identification 1983～1986.Seed Sci & L Technol,1987,15:431～434
［13］Fowler D P and Morris R W. Genetic diversity in red Pine:evidenci for low genetic heterozygosity,Can J For Res,1977,7:343～347
［14］Hamrick J L et al. Relationship between life history characteristics and eletroetically detedtable genetic variation in plant, Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1979,10:173～200
［15］Hamrick J L.Plant population genetic,Amer J Bot,1982,69:1685～1693
［16］Kim Zing Suk and Sook Woo Lee.Genetic diversity of three native Pinus in Korea,SPB. Acadmic Publish,1995,211～218
［17］Nei M.Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.Proc Nat Acad Sci USA,1973,70(12):3321～3323
［18］Zillman R R, Bushuk W. Wheat cultivar identification by gliadin electrophoregrams.Ⅱ Effects of envionmental and experimental factors on the gliadin electrophoregrams,Can J Plant Sci, 1979,59:281～286
［19］Zillman R R, Bushuk W. Wheat cultivar identification by gliadin electrophoregrams.Ⅲ.Catalogue of electrophoregrams fomul as of canadian wheat cultivars. Can J Plant Sci, 1979,59:287～288